Friday, 28 October 2011

£11000 for Light Brigade Medals

£11000 for Light Brigade Medals - News Article - Published 28th October 2011

News item, published today, begins:
"Doncaster man's Victorian war medals make £11,000Pte Pearson was wounded during the Charge of the Light Brigade Medals awarded to a Yorkshire man who took part in the Charge of the Light Brigade in the Crimean War have sold for £11,000.
The medals were awarded to Pte William Pearson, 17th Lancers, who was severely wounded in the charge at Balaklava in 1854..."

Read Full Article


Read Full Article

If you would like to locate your ancestors medals or find out what role they played in our military history visit UltraViolet Genealogy's "The Medal Reunited Project".

Monday, 24 October 2011

Step Briefing Note on Genealogist Fees

STEP issues Briefing Note on Genealogists' Fees

After pressure from some Genealogists' to restrict solicitors options in ensuring all beneficiaries are found prior to distribution of an estate, STEP have issued a "best practice guide".

The guide highlights the risks of PR's being "liable to the true beneficiaries in the event of an incorrect distribution of the estate" and that it is also "good practice to obtain a range of quotes from genealogists and you should be fully aware of the different options available".

The guide also highlights the neccassity to  "familiarise yourself with the legal arguments for and against such fees in order to protect yourself from any possible claim".. The PR should be satisfied that any charges agreed with the chosen research organisation are clear, represent good value for money and are appropriate to the cirumstances of the particular estate."

Nik Walker, Director of Harrisons Research & Genealogy comments: "This briefing by STEP highlights the need for a range of fee options needed for professionals to ensure that any fees charged reflect the time, resource and cost involved in each case and that the outcome is financially satisfactory for all parties involved.  There are pro's and cons' to each fee arrangement and a client needs to be able to trust that the company they use will issue the most cost effective arrangment for them and this briefing has clearly laid out the neccassity to obtain quotes and pricing structures from several companies before proceeding.  Harrisons Research & Genealogy offer several Fee arrangments and work hard with our clients to deliver the right option for them".

STEP Briefing Note: Personal Representatives and Trustees - Genealogists fees
This STEP Briefing Note sets out some issues to consider when a personal representative (PR) hires a genealogist to find heirs.  If you are acting as a PR of a deceased person you will be personally liable to the true beneficiaries in the event of an incorrect distribution of the estate.  Therefore it is your duty to take reasonable steps to find all those who are entitled and it may be necessary to employ a genealogical research firm to achieve this. 
It is the responsibility of a PR to select the most suitable research approach to employ.  A number of commercial firms offer this service and there is a range of fee options currently available. Search costs are commonly a general estate expense however, there are circumstances when this will not be the case, and PRs must also consider whether it is more appropriate to pay the costs of research from the entire estate or whether such costs should be deducted from any specific heirs’ portion particularly if there are undiscovered heirs.
It is good practice to obtain a range of quotes from genealogists and you should be fully aware of the different options available including time-based, contingency or fixed fee options. 
A summary of fee options and their implications follows:
The “Fixed Fee” option
Fixed fee options are set fees agreed in advance and in some cases may be payable only if a pre-determined goal is achieved.  This may be to find the heirs, verify an existing family tree or to prove negatives.  Such fees may be refundable if the goal is not achieved.  Fixed fees are normally payable within a short period of receiving the report from the genealogist.
The benefit of fixed fees is that PR’s are aware of the cost of the work in advance regardless of the actual time taken.  The disadvantage is that the genealogist may not be able to complete the work for the agreed fee, although this can be mitigated by agreeing that a refund will be made if this occurs. Alternatively the work may turn out to be less than expected but the fee may not be reduced.
Time-based fees
Time-based fees are charged according to the actual time spent, normally on a per hour basis, which is recorded and billed. In addition, out-of-pocket expenses incurred in providing the service, including copies of any certificates, Wills and Grants required, may be charged.  The benefit of such an approach is that the cost is consistent with the time spent.  The disadvantage is that the fee will increase as the work escalates and it may be unclear when the genealogist is originally commissioned how much time will need to be spent. Particularly in relation to smaller estates a PR will have to balance uncertain cost against the amount a beneficiary may receive.
Beneficiary contingency fees
Under beneficiary contingency fee agreements, once the genealogists have undertaken the research, they come to an agreement with each beneficiary they identify whereby the beneficiary agrees that the genealogist is to be paid a share of their entitlement when the estate is distributed.
The advantage is that known relatives of the deceased do not directly suffer the expense of tracing relatives that have lost touch with the family.  As the fee is a percentage of the assets distributed to unknown relatives the costs will not directly impact upon known relatives. The share of an estate that passes to known relatives may reduce depending upon the success of the genealogists, particularly if there are many lost relatives. 
The disadvantage of this approach is that, particularly in the case of large value estates, the fee may be not be proportionate to the effort that was required.  Moreover, there may be difficulties if a PR has instructed researchers without the involvement of all known beneficiaries. 
A PR would need to be confident that a contingency fee was likely to be less expensive than a fixed or time-based fee structure.  Generally PRs should not enter into any agreement which deducts fees from one or more beneficiary’s individual share rather than the residue as a whole without careful consideration.
The appropriateness of the contingent charging structure is not accepted by some commentators and there has been much comment on the contingent fee basis in both the professional and general press. It would be good practice to familiarise yourself with the legal arguments for and against such fees in order to protect yourself from any possible claim.
The PR should be satisfied that any charges agreed with the chosen research organisation are clear, represent good value for money and are appropriate to the circumstances of the particular estate

Harrisons Research & Genealogy Guide to Probate and Intestacy

UltraViolet Genealogy Probate Division Harrisons Research & Genealogy Guide to Probate and Intestacy
About Probate
Probate is the legal process of administering the estate of a deceased person by resolving all claims and distributing the deceased person's property.
A probate interprets the instructions of the deceased, decides the executor as the personal representative of the estate, and adjudicates the interests of heirs and other parties who may have claims against the estate.
England and Wales
When someone dies, issuing the legal document to the executor or other administrator to give them authority to deal with their estate is known as probate. The grant of representation is issued by the Probate Registry, which is a division of the High Court of Justice. If there is a will which appoints executors then the grant of representation will be a "Grant of Probate". If there is no will it will be a "Grant of Administration".
If there is a will but there are no executors validly appointed (for example if they have all died) then the grant will be a "Grant of Administration with Will Annexed".
It is not always necessary to obtain a grant of probate; some organisations, including many insurance companies, banks and building societies, will release funds to the executor of the will without seeing a grant of probate if the amount is small and the situation is not complex.
HM Treasurer Solicitor will consider releasing estates <£15,000 direct to a single proven claimant beneficiary with a simple disclaimer. This puts the onus on the beneficiary to locate and pay any further beneficiaries.
Letter of administration: Upon the death of a person intestate the Probate Division of the High Court of Justice or the local District Probate Registry will appoint an administrator who performs similar duties to an executor.
The court does this by granting letters of administration to the person so entitled. Grants of administration may be either general or limited. A general grant occurs where the deceased has died intestate. The order in which the court will make general grants of letters follows the sequence:
  • The surviving spouse, or civil partner, as the case may be;
  • The next of kin;
  • The Crown;
  • A creditor;
  • A stranger.
Where, under the rules for distribution of estates without a will (the Intestacy Rules), a child under 18 would inherit or a life interest would arise, then the Court or District Probate Registry would normally appoint a minimum of two administrators. On some estates under an intestacy, if it is not clear who are the next-of-kin, probate research may be required to find the entitled beneficiaries.

About Intestacy

Intestacy is a universal situation where a person dies and has not made a written declaration, which we know as a WILL which lays out who gets what of your estate. It is estimated 70% of people in the UK die intestate.
Wills can leave assets to friends as well as relatives and not only include certain people BUT also exclude people from inheriting.
When a person dies intestate ONLY family inherit starting with the nearest living relative and if none exist tracing back relatives via various links as outlined below.
Clearly a lot of people who have little money do not feel it necessary to write a will, but others with substantial assets should, tax can ravage a value estate of an intestate and monies perhaps go to people you might otherwise not wish to inherit.
In many cases those entitled to inherit and obvious such as a wife, husband, son, or other children, or failing that brothers and/or sisters of the deceased.
A close relative can apply to administer the estate of the deceased for PROBATE. This is called a "Grant of Representation", if the estate is large this may be best left to an accountant or solicitor as there may be tax and other legal issues.
If the estate is valuable then Inheritance Tax may be due(£325,000 threshold), Any tax and other expenses and debts must be settled BEFORE the net value is distributed to the beneficiaries.
If there are no obvious relatives to inherit a deceased's estate then a solicitor or close friend may refer the case to the Treasurer Solicitor in which case they will become legal administrator for that estate. They then hold the assets for up to 12 years after which they will pass to the State dependent on where the deceased died.
The estate will then be inherited in accordance with the rules of intestacy (see chart)
At some stage a beneficiary may come forward to claim an intestate's estate, and would apply to HM Treasury Solicitor to administer the estate and pay out beneficiaries. Where a Heir Hunter member has traced one of more beneficiaries they may apply to administer the estate on behalf of that beneficiary.
A Heir Hunter submitting a claim MUST be 100% certain they have found a valid AND entitled beneficiary and have contracted with them to act on their behalf for the above claim, and to receive their commission from the estate.
Dependent upon the passage of time between death of the intestate and the date of the claim will decide if any claims and expenses are still outstanding from the estate. Property perhaps has been sold, bank accounts closed etc and overall if the entire estate is held in cash by the Treasury Solicitor or in other forms and locations.

Bona Vacantia

The term "Bona Vacantia" literally means vacant goods and is the legal name for ownerless property, which by law passes to the crown.
The Treasury Solicitor is the Crown's Nominee for the purposes of the administration of the estates of persons who die intestate and without known kin and for the collection of the assets of dissolved companies and other miscellaneous bona vacantia in England and Wales.
Bona Vacantia arises, in origin, by virtue of the Royal Prerogative, i.e. at common law. To some extent this is still the position although the right to bona vacantia of the two major categories is now based on statute: the Administration of Estates Act 1925, the Companies Act 1985 (both as amended) and the Companies Act 2006. The work of Bona Vacantia dates from the Norman Conquest making it the earliest duty of what is now the Treasury Solicitor.
The Treasury Solicitor does not deal with bona vacantia in the Duchies of Cornwall and Lancaster; this is dealt with by Farrer and Co.
In Northern Ireland these matters are dealt with by the Crown Solicitor as the Treasury Solicitor's Nominee. Their address for contact is Crown Solicitor, Royal Courts of Justice, Chichester Street, Belfast BT1 3JY.
In Scotland bona vacantia is administered by the Queen's and Lord Treasurer's Remembrancer

How assets reach the Crown
When a person dies leaving assets it is important to discover who the new owner will be. In general, this is determined by either the will of the dead person ("the deceased") or, if the deceased left no will, by an Act of Parliament called the Administration of Estates Act 1925.
If the deceased left a valid will which gave away all of his or her assets then there can be no question of those assets passing to the Crown under the Administration of Estates Act. However, if there is no such will, section 46 of the Administration of Estates Act needs to be looked at to find out who the new owner will be. Section 46 sets out a list of different groups of people ("entitled relatives") who will be entitled to the assets in these circumstances. People in the groups nearer the top of the list will take before those in the groups nearer the bottom. The Crown is in a final group that takes effect if there is nobody in any of the earlier groups.
The people in the different groups of entitled relatives include the deceased's husband or wife and children together with a number of other relatives. (Please view the Entitled Relatives Tree Diagram).
The result is that the Crown is entitled to inherit a deceased's assets if he or she: (i) died without leaving a valid will which disposed of all of his or her assets; and (ii) was not survived by any relatives within the groups higher up the list; and (iii) was domiciled within England and Wales with the exception of the royal duchies of Lancaster and Cornwall. The purpose of this guide is to set out what the approach of the Crown is to property that it has inherited in this way. It is not an Act of Parliament and should not be read like one. New cases arise all the time and the Crown, through the Treasury Solicitor, will decide each case on its merits.

The power to make grants out of assets which reach the Crown
The starting point is that the assets belong to the Crown. They are an example of what lawyers call "bona vacantia" - legal Latin for "ownerless goods" (which can include assets other than just goods). The Crown is under no obligation to deal with such assets in any particular way. If they are not given away under the principles explained in the following paragraphs then, together with other forms of bona vacantia and subject to deduction of the costs of collection and administration, they will be transferred to the Exchequer to be dealt with in the same way as money raised by general taxation.
Although the assets belong to the Crown, the Crown has a power to make grants out of them - to give part or all of them away. This power is recorded in section 46 itself, which states that the Crown "may" make provision for the "dependants" of the deceased and for "other people for whom the [deceased] might reasonably have been expected to make provision". It does not matter whether the dependants were related to the deceased. Parliament's use of the word "may" emphasises that there is no obligation upon the Crown to make such provision. The use of the power is discretionary and no applicant has any right to a grant. However, the power must be exercised fairly.
The role of the Treasury Solicitor
The Treasury Solicitor has been appointed by the Crown to collect assets which pass to the Crown in the way outlined above and to exercise the power to make discretionary grants. The Treasury Solicitor acts upon guidance and directions received from HM Treasury. The Treasury Solicitor deals with all matters relating to bona vacantia through a specialist section of the Treasury Solicitor's Department known as the Bona Vacantia Division (see the contact details at the end of this guide).
The Treasury Solicitor's policy
The Treasury Solicitor's policy is to consider all applications on their merits and to make grants to people who the deceased might reasonably have been expected to benefit (including, where appropriate, the deceased's dependants). This general statement of policy should be read in the light of factors set out elsewhere in this guide. Decisions will be taken in the light of all information available to the Treasury Solicitor at the time of the decision. They will be communicated to applicants as soon as practicable.
Section 5 of this guide provides examples of the sorts of cases in which the Treasury Solicitor has exercised the discretion to make discretionary grants. These examples are intended to be helpful but are not intended to provide a complete picture.
The factors which the Treasury Solicitor will consider include:
  1. the size and nature of the deceased's "net estate" (see paragraph 11, below);
  2. the length and nature of the relationship between the deceased and the applicant;
  3. any legal or moral obligations which the deceased had towards the applicant;
  4. the way in which the applicant behaved towards the deceased including the contribution (if any) made by the applicant to the welfare of the deceased; and
  5. any other matter which, in the particular circumstances, the Treasury Solicitor considers relevant.
The practical effects of these factors are explored at greater length in sections 3, 4 and 5 below.
The "net estate" of a deceased person is the difference between the total value of the deceased's assets less funeral, testamentary and administration expenses, debts and liabilities, including any inheritance tax payable out of the estate on death. Administration expenses will include the Treasury Solicitor's costs of administering the estate.
How to apply for a discretionary grant
 The Treasury Solicitor does not insist upon the use of a particular form - applications in any written form will be considered, including applications made by e-mail. If it is not practicable for an applicant to make a written application, prospective applicants should contact the Bona Vacantia Division using the contact details at the end of this guide.
Despite this flexible approach, it is important that the Treasury Solicitor has as much relevant information as possible before he determines an application for a discretionary grant. It follows that all applicants, but especially those who have applied informally, may need to add substantially to the information which they have initially provided. The Treasury Solicitor is entitled to request further information where necessary and to postpone a decision upon a grant to allow time for it to be provided.
The Treasury Solicitor may believe from information already on file that a grant should be made. In such circumstances the Treasury Solicitor can make a grant without any application being made. However, these cases are likely to be rare and an application should, where possible, be made.
When to apply
 It is important that applications are submitted as soon as possible. This will help to prevent evidence being lost or watered down and will help the Treasury Solicitor to determine all applications for grants from a single estate at the same time. Nonetheless, the Treasury Solicitor cannot determine applications for grants until the administration of the deceased's estate is complete. This is because the extent of the assets comprised within the estate will not be clear until then.
The amount or value that may be granted
It is not possible here to provide detailed guidance about the likely values of grants. The circumstances vary too much.
 Nonetheless, the following basic points may be found helpful.
  1. No grant can be made unless the deceased's assets have passed to the Crown. This may seem obvious, but applicants sometimes lose sight of it in cases in which relatives who are entitled to the assets come forward.
  2. No grant can exceed the amount of the deceased's net estate.
  3. If there are two or more applicants, the Treasury Solicitor will determine the applications in a way which takes proper account of the interests of all applicants and of the Crown.
  4. The Treasury Solicitor will consider, but will not be bound by, any statement of reasons which the applicant submits in support of an application for a discretionary grant of a specified amount. In a case in which an applicant has provided services to a deceased free of charge, evidence of what it would have cost the deceased to buy such services may be helpful. However, it should always be remembered that a discretionary grant from the Treasury Solicitor is a recognition of the applicant's services rather than a payment for them.
  5. The Treasury Solicitor's practice is to make a deduction of 5% from the amount of a net estate before making a discretionary grant. The purpose of this deduction, which is known as the "insurance provision", is to create a fund to protect the Crown against cases in which discretionary grants are made and entitled relatives later come forward..
Under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975, people within a number of different categories can make a claim against the estate of a deceased person on the ground that "reasonable financial provision" was not originally made for them.
 The relevant categories of applicants include the husband or wife of the deceased, a child of the deceased, a person who has lived together with the deceased in the same household for two years immediately before the date of death as the husband or wife of the deceased and a person who was being maintained by the deceased immediately before his or her death. There are other categories. Claims under the Act require court proceedings which must generally be brought within six months of the date on which a grant of representation is first taken out. If you think that you may be able to make such a claim then you should seek independent legal advice from a solicitor or Citizens' Advice Bureau as soon as possible.
The powers of the courts to make orders under the 1975 Act (which replaced and extended powers first introduced in 1938) often overlap with the Treasury Solicitor's powers to make discretionary grants. Since the same sum of money cannot be paid twice, which application will be dealt with first?
The answer is that, before determining an application for a discretionary payment, the Treasury Solicitor will normally require an applicant to make a claim under the 1975 Act. This is because the administration of an estate is not fully complete while a claim under the 1975 Act is outstanding. Accordingly, a discretionary grant cannot normally be made until the outcome of any court proceedings (including threatened court proceedings) is known.
The Treasury Solicitor may depart from the above approach if the deceased's estate is only of a modest size (less than £20,000) or in other circumstances where the Treasury Solicitor thinks that it would not be reasonable to expect an application under the 1975 Act to be pursued - for example, when the applicant is frail due to old age or ill health.
The ground upon which court orders are made under the 1975 Act is not the same as the Treasury Solicitor's policy in relation to discretionary grants. However, similar considerations may well apply to applications for each.
The deceased's last wishes
 The Treasury Solicitor will consider evidence about the last wishes of the deceased. The way in which those wishes were expressed is less important than the reliability of the evidence that the deceased wished them to take effect after his death. Examples of relevant evidence may include:
  1. (a) a formal will, invalid owing to some defect of execution; and
  2. (b) detailed written instructions from the deceased to his solicitor setting out his last wishes.
The Treasury Solicitor is entitled to request further information about an alleged statement by the deceased. Allegations of uncorroborated oral statements will be treated with considerable caution.
 Although the Treasury Solicitor will consider the deceased's last wishes, it does not follow that he will necessarily give effect to them. The Treasury Solicitor will consider all relevant matters and may well have a clearer idea of the extent of the deceased's assets than the deceased had - especially if he or she died unexpectedly.
Cases in which the deceased has left a valid will
It may seem surprising that there can be any possibility of property passing to the Crown in a case in which the deceased left a valid will. However, this can happen when the deceased left a valid will which did not effectively dispose of the whole of his estate. Discretionary grants are sometimes made in these cases.
One example merits specific consideration. Section 15 of the Wills Act 1837 provides that a gift to a person who witnesses the execution of a will is void. So, if the deceased did not make an alternative gift and did not leave any entitled relatives, the property which is the subject of the failed gift may pass to the Crown as bona vacantia. Although the witness who lost the gift may apply for a grant, a grant will not automatically be made to that witness.
The first part of this section contains examples of the types of cases in which discretionary grants have commonly been made. The second part of this section contains examples of the types of case in which they have commonly been refused. They are intended to be helpful but not to provide a complete picture or to guarantee that grants will automatically be made where similar circumstances arise.
Examples of common cases where grants have been made
Services and kindnesses rendered
  1. An applicant for a grant may have provided the deceased with substantial free services for which the deceased might otherwise have had to pay. The deceased might reasonably have been expected to leave the applicant something in recognition of those services. Although this did not occur, the Treasury Solicitor is able to make a grant to the applicant to discharge the deceased's moral obligation.
  2. Examples of the sorts of services relied upon by applicants in the past have been washing, cleaning, cooking, shopping, providing nursing care, repairing or redecorating the deceased's property and helping the deceased with financial or business matters.
  3. Discretionary grants may also be appropriate where the applicant has rendered acts of kindness to the deceased which have been of real help and value even though they did not include things for which the deceased might have reasonably been expected to pay.
  4. A discretionary grant is unlikely to be made when the acts relied upon are not substantial. Similarly, a grant is unlikely to be made if the Treasury Solicitor considers that the evidence put forward in support of the application is unconvincing.
Established relationships - partners
  1. If the deceased was married at the time of his or her death then, in general, the estate will not pass to the Crown. However, discretionary grants have often been made in cases when the applicant and the deceased, although unmarried, lived together in an established relationship. For example, the deceased may have lived with his or her partner as man and wife. Alternatively, the deceased may have lived with his or her partner in an established same sex relationship.
  2. Such partners may have a claim under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975. If so, the policy of the Treasury Solicitor is not to make discretionary grants until the application under the 1975 Act has been concluded. For more details, see section 3, above.
Established relationships - other cases
  1. Discretionary grants have been made in cases in which the deceased and the applicant had a close relationship. Examples include cases where:
    1. the applicant was dependent upon the deceased;
    2. the applicant and the deceased made their home together as way of enjoying friendship and support without an intimate physical relationship.
  2. Cases in this class vary widely and all applications will be considered against the Treasury Solicitor's general policy.
  3. Evidence that there has been little or no association during the latter years of a deceased's life may tend to weaken an application (and see paragraph 10(c), above).
Grants to charities and other bodies
It is possible for the Treasury Solicitor to make grants to charities and other bodies. The Treasury Solicitor adopts the same approach to grants to these bodies as he does to other grants. For example, the Treasury Solicitor could make a grant to a hospice which has cared for the deceased at considerable expense throughout a long terminal illness.
Examples of common cases where grants have been refused
Applications based solely upon the following have commonly been refused.
  1. the applicant's financial circumstances;
  2. the fact that the applicant is related by marriage to the husband or wife of the deceased;
  3. the fact that the applicant was the fiancé/e of the deceased;
  4. friendship; and
  5. conversations in which the deceased stated an intention to benefit the applicant.
Similarly, natural kinship (that is, blood relationship) alone is unlikely to justify a grant by itself. However, it should be recalled that most close relatives will be entitled under the Administration of Estates Act, thereby preventing the estate from passing to the Crown as bona vacantia at all.
It should be stressed that applicants in the cases listed above are not barred from receiving discretionary grants.
  1. The cost to the Treasury Solicitor of administering the deceased's estate is one of the items to be taken into account when determining the sum from which a discretionary grant can be made.
  2. The Treasury Solicitor's costs involve two elements: (i) disbursements; and (ii) staff costs.
  3. Disbursements are charged to the estate account at cost.
  4. Staff costs are calculated using a form of time costing based upon the hourly rate of the case officer handling the file together with a percentage increase (typically between 30% and 50%) to reflect the complexity of the issues involved. The hourly rates of case officers differ depending upon seniority.
  5. The Treasury Solicitor's charging system is currently under review. The percentage addition is likely to be excluded and the hourly rates increased to reflect the true cost to the Treasury Solicitor of administering the estate.
 An applicant's costs of applying for a discretionary grant will not generally be refunded.
The insurance provision.
  1. Before the Treasury Solicitor administers a deceased's estate as bona vacantia he advertises for entitled relatives. These advertisements are placed on the Bona Vacantia Division's website and in newspapers circulating in the area where the deceased used to live.
  2. It occasionally happens that, despite such advertisements, no entitled relatives come forward until after an estate has been administered and a discretionary grant made. Provided that the entitled relatives come forward within 12 years, the Treasury Solicitor will pass the whole of the estate to the deceased person's relatives. In these circumstances, the Treasury Solicitor does not usually try to recover discretionary grants from the people to whom they have already been paid (but see para. 4, below). So the result is that the Crown will be out of pocket.
  3. To protect the Crown against such losses, the Treasury Solicitor retains a set percentage of all bona vacantia estates as a form of insurance. The current rate is 5% and has been set at a level which reflects the Treasury Solicitor's past experience of late claims by entitled relatives. The Treasury Solicitor may change the insurance provision at any time without notice to reflect changes in her experience of claims.
  4. The Treasury Solicitor retains the right to seek repayment of discretionary grants from people who have withheld material information and/or misrepresented material facts.
In accordance with good practice, and with the aim of preventing money laundering, the Treasury Solicitor (as the Crown's Nominee for dealing with assets that vest in him as bona vacantia) operates in accordance with the principles laid down in Part VII of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (“the Act”) and the Money Laundering Regulations 2003 (“the Regulations”).
For that reason, the Treasury Solicitor makes such enquiries as are deemed necessary to comply with the Act and the Regulations, including obtaining evidence of identity from those with whom we do business and retaining such evidence in accordance with our record-keeping procedure.

For assistance with your porbate research contact